![]() This allows the image to give some insight into how the characters will treat the event of death. In the second, the character is to be feared and avoided. In the first instance, Death is portrayed as a character you might celebrate and to welcome with open arms. The imagery you assign to an abstract concept can completely change the meaning of the events in your work. Or maybe your incarnation of Death is cold and dead, gliding lifelessly about and moving from space to space with surgical precision. Perhaps he has a bold sense of humor and a contagious laugh as he courteously guides you through the first few steps of the afterlife. One very common example of personification is the idea that Death is a robed figure rather than an unknowable event.īy giving Death a physical form, we reduce the uncertainty of the concept, thus making it easier for a human brain to comprehend.įrom there, we could alter the way Death is perceived in that particular work by changing the figure’s personality. It can also be used to make abstract concepts feel more tangible and thus more relatable. Personification is often used in creative writing, and especially poetry, to create imagery and concepts unique to that work. Personification is the more commonly used term, partially due to applying to a wider number of situations, which simply makes it a more convenient term to use. Personification is the broader of the two terms and can refer to any instance of the nonhuman in literature exhibiting human qualities.Īs such, every instance of pathetic fallacy is also an example of personification, while not every instance of personification is an example of pathetic fallacy. Pathetic fallacy is the more specific of the two and involves attributing emotional reactions of some kind to an inanimate object. The main difference is the scale of the two terms. Personification and pathetic fallacy both involve giving human-like qualities to something nonhuman, like an object or an abstract concept. It’s more specific as it only involves human emotionsĬan be any human feature, quality, or action that only humans can doĪ creative tool that helps better describe or explain ideas and concepts thus, “breathing life” to an otherwise dull storyĪ useful literary tool that helps set the tone or mood of a scene to create a more powerful picture of a character’s emotional state More general in scope as it involves any human-like quality or feature Used to create a more vivid illustration of a poem or story, therefore creating a more profound connection with the readerĪlways used to give emotions to inanimate objects – typically elements of nature or the environment ![]() Let’s get started! What Is the Difference Between Personification and Pathetic Fallacy?Ī figure of speech that projects any human qualities or features to non-human objectsĪ specific type of personification that gives human emotions to non-human objects If you want to know all about the differences between personification and pathetic fallacy, then you’re in the right place. The pathetic fallacy involves attributing emotional reactions to something inanimate. Personalization can refer to any instance in literature where a nonhuman displays human characteristics. The key difference between personification and pathetic fallacy is the scale. Here’s the difference between personification and pathetic fallacy:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |